Altered Pattern of Trunk Movement During Spiking in Elite High School Volleyball Players with Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

Yui-Tai Chen, Po-Tsun Chen
Purpose:

To compare the difference of S-HSA during spiking between volleyball players with and without SAIS.To compare the difference of S-HSA during spiking between volleyball players with and without SAIS.

Methods:

Fourteen elite high school volleyball players, seven players with and another seven without SAIS, were recruited to evaluate the range of thoracic rotation (RTR) and spiking kinematics. A motion capture system was employed to measure the thoracic, pelvic, shoulder, and scapular kinematics during spiking. The S-HSA were extracted at the timing of maximum shoulder external rotation (MER) and ball contact (BC) as well as the maximal amplitude. The Mann-Whitney U test examined differences in RTR, ball speed, and spiking kinematics between the two groups.

Results:

No significant difference in RTR and ball speed was found between the two groups. SAIS group exhibited less S-HSA than non-SAIS group at MER and BC events (maximal S-HSA: 16.15° ± 8.18°  vs. 25.63°  ± 3.55°, p= 0.025; S-HSA at MER: 9.24° ± 4.81° vs. 18.06° ± 2.58°, p= 0.002; S-HSA at BC: -2.23° ± 5.56° vs. 7.89° ± 5.41°, p= 0.009). In addition, the SAIS group showed more internal rotation of the scapula than the control group at BC (-22.44° ± 10.37° vs. -3.20° ± 16.55°, p= 0.048).

Conclusion(s):

Although there was no significant limitation in spinal rotation, volleyball players with SAIS showed less S-HSA during spiking. The increased scapular internal rotation at BC may be a compensatory strategy and may raise the risk of SAIS.

Implications:

Future study needs to compare the effects of shoulder- and spinal-focused intervention on clinical symptoms and spiking kinematics in volleyball players with SAIS.

Funding acknowledgements:
Linkou Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital Number: CMRPD1M0651
Keywords:
Spiking kinematics
Shoulder-hip separation
Overhead sports
Primary topic:
Sport and sports injuries
Second topic:
Musculoskeletal: upper limb
Third topic:
Musculoskeletal
Did this work require ethics approval?:
Yes
Name the institution and ethics committee that approved your work:
Chang Gung Medical Foundation Institutional Review Board
Provide the ethics approval number:
202200450B0
Has any of this material been/due to be published or presented at another national or international conference prior to the World Physiotherapy Congress 2025?:
No

Back to the listing