File
J. Rodríguez-Sanz1, C. López-de-Celis2, C. Hidalgo-García3, V. González-Rueda2, L. Llurda-Almuzara4, N. Labata-Lezaun1, M. Canet-Vintró1, A. Pérez-Bellmunt1
1Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Basic Sciences, Barcelona, Spain, 2Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Physiotherapy, Barcelona, Spain, 3Universidad de Zaragoza, Fisiatría y Enfermería, Zaragoza, Spain, 4EUNEIZ, Physiotherapy, Vitoria, Spain
Background: Tecar therapy is a non-invasive electrothermal therapy classified as deep thermotherapy. Currently, it is a therapy widely used in rehabilitation, but it is not known if its effects can reach deep structures.
Purpose: To analyze the change in temperature and current flow in tissues when different tecar protocols are applied to the thigh, knee and calf.
Methods: Three cross-sectional cadaveric studies with 15 cryopreserved cadavers (30 legs). Four 5-minute interventions (resistive high/low-power and capacitive high/low-power) were performed by an experienced physiotherapist. The temperature of the Achilles tendon, musculotendinous junction, intra- and extracapsular part of the knee, quadriceps and biceps femoris was recorded for 5 minutes using invasive temperature gauges placed with ultrasound. The data were analyzed with SPSS software.
Results: Low-power applications showed a low thermal effect (p>0.05) with a significant current flow (p<0.05). The high-power resistive application recorded the highest increase in temperatures and current flow (p<0.05). The high-power capacitive application recorded a greater increase in surface temperature compared to low-power (p>0.05). These results could serve as basic science data to justify accelerating muscle, tendon and capsular recovery by enhancing cell proliferation without increasing temperature in acute injuries and increasing temperature and viscoelasticity in chronic processes.
Conclusions: Low-power protocols generate a mild thermal effect but current flow. High-power protocols generate increased temperature and current flow. The high-power resistive protocol produced the greatest temperature rise in deep structures. The capacitive treatments achieved the greatest increase in surface temperature.
Implications: These basic results are crucial for understanding the effect of tecar therapies (widely used in clinical practice). We know that the current flow is related to cell proliferation and tissue regeneration and the increased thermal effect to viscoelastic tissue enhancement. Knowing the deepening capacity of these effects, we can improve the recovery of certain structural injuries of the lower limb.
Funding acknowledgements: To all the body donors.
Keywords:
Hyperthermia
Physical Therapy
CRet
Hyperthermia
Physical Therapy
CRet
Topics:
Musculoskeletal: lower limb
Sport & sports injuries
Musculoskeletal
Musculoskeletal: lower limb
Sport & sports injuries
Musculoskeletal
Did this work require ethics approval? Yes
Institution: Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
Committee: Research Committee (CER) of Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
Ethics number: CBAS-2019-18 and CBAS 2019-07.
All authors, affiliations and abstracts have been published as submitted.