Comparison of Cardiorespiratory and Metabolic Responses Between Tetanic and Sub-Tetanic Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation

Toshiaki Miyamoto, Hideya Yanamoto
Purpose:

The purpose of this study was to compare the cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses between tNMES and sNMES.

Methods:

Thirteen healthy adult males (20.7 ± 0.6 years old) participated in the study. Each subject underwent three trials: 30-min bed rest, 30-min tNMES, and 30-min sNMES. NMES was applied to the bilateral skeletal muscles distal to the waist using belt electrodes, with stimulation intensity set to the maximum tolerable level. During each trial, respiratory gas exchange (VO2, oxygen consumption; VE, minute vantilation; RQ, respiratory quotient) and electrocardiography (HR, heart rate) were measured, and blood examinations (blood glucose, lactate, and BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor concentrations) were conducted before and after each trial. Statistical analyses for these parameters were performed using repeated measures ANOVA or Friedman test, with a significance level set at 5%.

Results:

While there was no significant difference in the stimulation electrical current applied to the thighs between tNMES and sNMES, the current applied to the lower limbs during tNMES was significantly lower than that during sNMES due to pain and discomfort. sNMES resulted in significantly higher VO2 (15.9 ± 3.6 vs. 12.0 ± 3.5 ml/min/kg, p 0.05, 95% CI [-6.35, -1.59]) and HR (100.2 ± 8.8 vs. 89.6 ± 9.4 bpm, p 0.05, 95% CI [-17.12, -4.08]) compared to tNMES. sNMES increased RQ more than tNMES (p 0.05, 95% CI [-0.083, -0.020]) and exhibited a stronger blood glucose-lowering effect (p 0.05, 95% CI [3.6, 13.32]). Although lactate and BDNF concentrations significantly increased with both NMES modalities (both p 0.05), no significant differences were observed between the two (both p > 0.05).

Conclusion(s):

sNMES, which induces lower torque than tNMES, elicits significantly higher cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses, requiring VO2 equivalent to walking activity. Furthermore, sNMES appears to enhance glycolytic activity due to NMES-specific disorderly recruitment more strongly than tNMES.

Implications:

sNMES may complement reduced physical activity during hospitalization and, when combined with tNMES, could further improve physical function in individuals with reduced phisical activity.

Funding acknowledgements:
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP23K10441.
Keywords:
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation
Skeletal Muscle
Training
Primary topic:
Disability and rehabilitation
Second topic:
Other
Third topic:
Innovative technology: robotics
Did this work require ethics approval?:
Yes
Name the institution and ethics committee that approved your work:
the Ethical Committee of Kansai Medical University
Provide the ethics approval number:
2023412
Has any of this material been/due to be published or presented at another national or international conference prior to the World Physiotherapy Congress 2025?:
No

Back to the listing