CURL UP EXERCISES DO NOT IMPROVE OR WORSEN INTER-RECTI DISTANCE BUT IMPROVE ABDOMINAL MUSCLE STRENGTH IN WOMEN WITH DIASTASIS RECTI ABDOMINIS POSTPARTUM - A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL

S. Gluppe1, M. Ellström Engh2, K. Bø1,2
1Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Institute of Sports Medicine, Oslo, Norway, 2Akershus University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lørenskog, Norway

Background: Diastasis recti abdominis (DRA) is a prevalent condition in the postpartum period. Systematic reviews have concluded with low-quality methodology of studies and insufficient evidence for recommending specific exercises for women with the condition.

Purpose: The primary aim was to evaluate the effect of a 12 weeks home-based abdominal exercise program on prevalence of DRA and change in inter-recti distance (IRD). Secondary outcomes were abdominal muscle strength, endurance, and thickness, prevalence on abdominal-, low-back and pelvic girdle pain, pelvic floor disorders (PFD), and perceived change of the condition.

Methods: This was an assessor blinded two-arm parallel group randomized controlled trial conducted from January 2020 to December 2022. Inclusion criteria were; being 6-12 months postpartum, primi- or multiparous, having a single- or multiple pregnancy following any mode of delivery, with a diagnosis of DRA. IRD and muscle thickness was assessed with ultrasound, abdominal muscle- strength and endurance with a dynamometer and a curl-up test. If women responded yes to abdominal-, low-back or pelvic girdle pain, or PFD they further responded to valid and reliable questionnaires for these specific conditions. At post-test women reported whether they perceived improvement of DRA. For the intervention group a 5-days a week standardized exercise program was prescribed, consisting of head lift, abdominal curl-up and twisted abdominal curl-up. The control group received no intervention. Difference in change between groups for continuous variables was assessed with ANCOVA, with posttest value as the dependent variable and grouping- and pretest variable as the independent variables, reported with 95% CI. Analyzes were based on intention-­to-­treat.

Results: Seventy women were randomized to exercise- (n=35) or control group (n=35). Three women (8.6%) dropped out of the exercise group. Twenty-one (65.6%) of women in the exercise group adhered to 80% or more of prescribed exercise sessions. There were no statistically significant differences in any IRD measurements between groups at post-test and no difference in change between the two groups from pre- to posttest; IRD at rest 2 cm above umbilicus (1.24 mm, CI -0.83, 3.31, p=0.24). Women in the exercise group reported significantly better improvement of DRA than the control group and showed a significant increase in abdominal muscle strength compared to the control group. No effect was found in prevalence of PFD, low back-, pelvic girdle- and abdominal pain.

Conclusions: An exercise program containing curl-ups was not effective in decreasing IRD or low-back-, pelvic girdle-, and abdominal pain, and PFD. However, the exercise program was effective in increasing abdominal muscle strength and self-reported DRA improvement. Women with DRA can improve abdominal strength through curl-ups with no negative effect on IRD.

Implications: This study contributes to improved knowledge about the effect of specific abdominal exercises on DRA and that women with DRA can improve strength without reducing IRD. There is a need for further high quality RCTs of different exercise programs to enable guidance of women returning to exercise postpartum.

Funding acknowledgements: The study was fully funded by The Norwegian Women`s Public Health Association.

Keywords:
Diastasis recti abdominis
Randomized controlled trial
Abdominal exercises

Topics:
Musculoskeletal
Disability & rehabilitation
Pelvic, sexual and reproductive health

Did this work require ethics approval? Yes
Institution: The Norwegian School of Sport Sciences
Committee: Regional Medical Ethics Committee, Norwegian Centre for Research Data
Ethics number: REK South East 2018/2312 and 440860

All authors, affiliations and abstracts have been published as submitted.

Back to the listing