The aim of this study was to develop, validate and test the reliability an assessment tool that evaluates the effectiveness of a physiotherapy undergraduate clinical education programme.
A mixed-method study of four phases. The first phase determined the items and domains that needed to be included in the tool. Focus group discussions (FGD) were held nationally in South Africa with physiotherapy academics; clinical supervisors/educators; clinical managers and newly qualified physiotherapists. Phases two-four determined the face, content and construct validity of the tool, via the Delphi method and a survey, respectively. Additionally, exploratory factor analysis was used for item reductio
Three themes emerged from the FGD: Governance; Structure and Experience, with domains and items relating to: Governance; Academic Processes; Learning Exposure; Clinical Orientation; Clinical Supervision and Quality Assurance & Monitoring and Evaluation. The Vaneshveri Naidoo Clinical Programme Evaluation Tool (VN-CPET) of 58 items, and six categories was developed. VN-CPET was found to be valid and reliable (α=0.75).
VN-CPET, a valid and reliable standardised tool, can be used to evaluate the quality and effectiveness of a physiotherapy undergraduate clinical education programme
This validated and standardised monitoring and evaluation and quality assurance tool can be used to evaluate the length, breadth, and depth of a physiotherapy clinical education programme.
Monitoring and Evaluation
Quality Assurance