Dynamic proprioceptive postural control in a Thai population

File
Santhanee Khruakhorn, Wanicha Chaiteerayanont, Vinitha Puengtanom, Meixing Liao, Simon Brumagne, Vân Lê Thanh
Purpose:

The aim of this study is to assess the dynamic proprioceptive control performance in a Thai population.

Methods:

Twenty-two healthy Thai individuals and six Thai patients with LBP provided their informed consent and performed the 5xSTSTS as fast as possible, but in a controlled way. The total duration to perform five successive STSTS movements was used as the main outcome measure. The unpaired t-test was used to calculate group differences in performance. All data are presented as means ± standard deviations. The level of statistical significance was set at P 0.05.

Results:

The overall mean duration of the 5xSTSTS was 11.2 ± 3.0 s. The patients with LBP performed the task significantly slower (16.0 ± 2.4 s) compared to the healthy subjects (9.9 ± 1.4 s) (P 0.001).

Conclusion(s):

Thai individuals with LBP seem to have decreased dynamic proprioceptive control compared to healthy Thai individuals reflected by slower performance of the 5xSTSTS task. These results are comparable to their Belgian/ Western counterparts and warrant further validation in larger samples and by comparing the 5xSTSTS performance with their actual proprioceptive control strategy.

Implications:

The simple and cost-effective 5xSTSTS task may be used to assess the dynamic proprioceptive control performance of people in low- and middle-income countries and may help in selecting an effective treatment for LBP.

References

Claeys et al. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012;22: 821-828

Denteneer et al. Spine J. 2018;18: 190-207

Goossens et al. 2019, NeuroImage Clin. 2019;23: 101881

Yiengprugsawan et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18:19.

 


Funding acknowledgements:
Fund for Scientific Research – Flanders (FWO K801824N)
Keywords:
low back pain
postural control
proprioception
Primary topic:
Musculoskeletal: spine
Second topic:
Pain and pain management
Did this work require ethics approval?:
Yes
Name the institution and ethics committee that approved your work:
Ethics Committee Research UZ/ KU Leuven
Provide the ethics approval number:
S67192
Has any of this material been/due to be published or presented at another national or international conference prior to the World Physiotherapy Congress 2025?:
No

Back to the listing