File
T. Shousha1,2, M. Alayat3,2, I. Moustafa1,2
1College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Physiotherapy, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, 2Faculty of Physical Therapy / Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt, 3College of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al Qura University, Physiotherapy, Mekkah, Saudi Arabia
Background: Low level lasers have been used as an alternative pain relief therapy for muscle and joint pain, since it induces analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and biomodulation effects of the physiological cell functions. The effectiveness of low-level laser therapy in temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMD) treatment, however, is not well established. Although Surface electromyography (sEMG) has been suggested as a complementary means in TMD diagnosis,
the effect of conservative treatments on muscle activity has not yet been thoroughly correlated with (sEMG) findings.
the effect of conservative treatments on muscle activity has not yet been thoroughly correlated with (sEMG) findings.
Purpose: To assess the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) as compared to occlusive splint therapy (OST) on the TMJ opening index (TOI) and sEMG of masticatory muscles.
Methods: 112 female subjects suffering from unilateral myogenous TMD, aged 21–30 years-old, were recruited and divided into three groups: LLLT; soft occlusive splint therapy OST and a waitlist group as controls.
Outcome measures: TMJ opening index (TOI), Visual analogue scale (VAS), surface electromyography (sEMG).
Outcome measures: TMJ opening index (TOI), Visual analogue scale (VAS), surface electromyography (sEMG).
Results: A significant reduction was reported in TOI, VAS and the sEMG within the LLLT and OST groups as well as significant decrease in all outcomes between groups in favor of the LLLT group (P< 0.0001). Meanwhile, there was a weak significant difference within the control group probably attributed to the analgesic. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons between groups [control vs occlusive splints, control vs low-level laser and low-level laser vs occlusive splints] revealed significant differences in the VAS and TOI [P = 0.0001; 95% CI: 0.9–2.2, 1.61–4.01, 0.65–1.96].
Conclusions: Findings support an evident short term therapeutic effect of the LLLT on improving VAS, TOI and sEMG in females suffering from myogenous TMD.
Implications: The findings of this study provide objective evidence of the effect of using low-level laser in relieving pain and improving mouth opening as guided by the sEMG findings.
Funding acknowledgements: This research was not funded
Keywords:
Temporomandibular
Occlusive
Laser
Temporomandibular
Occlusive
Laser
Topics:
Musculoskeletal
Pain & pain management
Musculoskeletal
Pain & pain management
Did this work require ethics approval? Yes
Institution: Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University
Committee: Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University
Ethics number: P.T.REC/012/002876
All authors, affiliations and abstracts have been published as submitted.