Evaluating Mobility in Middle-Aged Adults Using Smartphone Accelerometry During the Sit-to-Stand Test

File
Itai Gutman, Roee Hayek, Yaniv Nudelman, Shmuel Springer, Guy Baranes
Purpose:

To examine whether analysis of smartphone-based accelerometry during sit-to-stand tests performed on a regular chair and a cushioned sofa could be useful for detecting subtle changes in mobility in middle age.


Methods:

Twenty-three young (25.0±2.5 years), 25 middle-aged (52.0±5.2 years), and 17 older adults (70.0±4.1 years) performed the 5-times sit-to-stand test on both a standard chair (height = 0.46 cm, depth = 0.45 cm) and a cushioned sofa (height = 0.40 cm, depth = 0.50 cm). A smartphone attached to the participant's lower back was used to measure lower-limb muscle power, maximal vertical velocity (MVV) during rising, the duration of the total task and the sub-phase of transition from sitting to standing (SiToSt), and repetition variability using the dynamic time warping (DTW) method.One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or the Kruskal-Wallis compared between age groups, with post-hoc analysis as appropriate. 

Results:

Middle-aged adults exhibited reduced lower-limb muscle power compared to young adults (5.25 vs 6.19 W/kg, p=0.034), with the difference being more pronounced on the sofa (6.23 vs 8.08 W/kg, p=0.004). Differences between middle-aged and young adults in terms of MVV (0.87 vs 1.02 m/sec, p=0.011) and SiToSt duration (0.41 vs 0.33 sec, p=0.038) were only detected on the sofa, and the middle-aged adults showed less variability compared to the older adults on the chair (1.1 vs 1.63, p=0.018). In either condition, there was no difference in total task duration between the middle-aged group and the young or older adults.

Conclusion(s):

Smartphone accelerometry-derived measures, such as power and maximal rising velocity, may identify subtle changes in mobility performance in middle age. Our findings may offer a simple and accessible screening tool for mobility assessment in this population.

Implications:

Growing evidence highlights the importance of assessing mobility before the age of 65 to identify preclinical mobility impairments. Traditional tests such as the 5-times sit-to-stand are often not sensitive enough to detect subtle deterioration in midlife. Our findings which demonstrated the utility of a smartphone accelerometry-based sit-to-stand in identifying subtle mobility changes in midlife can enhance physiotherapists' abilities that play a critical role in the early detection of functional decline and the adaptation of interventions. Additionally, physiotherapists should explore more challenging variations, such as performing 5-times STS from a cushioned sofa, to improve midlife mobility assessment and preventive care strategies.

Funding acknowledgements:
No funding.
Keywords:
Aging
Midlife
Mobility
Primary topic:
Health promotion and wellbeing/healthy ageing/physical activity
Did this work require ethics approval?:
Yes
Name the institution and ethics committee that approved your work:
Ariel University Ethics Committee
Provide the ethics approval number:
AU-HEA-SS-20230806
Has any of this material been/due to be published or presented at another national or international conference prior to the World Physiotherapy Congress 2025?:
No

Back to the listing