Experiences and opinions of para-athletes, coaches and managers regarding the state of para-sports in South Africa

File
Siyabonga Kunene
Purpose:

To describe the experiences and opinions of para-athletes and technical personnel regarding the state of para-sports in South Africa.

Methods:

This was a qualitative study design based on semi-structured interviews. Interviews were conducted with para-athletes, coaches/ managers. Permission was obtained from a physical disability association. Ethical clearance was issued by the University of the Witwatersrand Human Research Ethics Committee. An interview schedule with predetermined questions was used to guide the interviews. Interviews were held face-to-face or online for 20-30 minutes per interview. All participants gave consent. The data were transcribed verbatim and analysed in themes deductively. 

Results:

23 Paralympians (12 females and 11 males) and 16 coaches/ managers (9 males and 7 females) participated. Results showed that sports health benefits, a sense of belonging, fulfilment, winning, and support from family and sports authorities were reported as facilitators of para-sports participation. Participants reported that apartheid, disability stigma and discrimination, lack of opportunities, poor access to key needed services, limited access to resources, lack of access to facilities, and lack of para-sports knowledge and skills negatively impacted para-sports in South Africa. Access to funding, healthcare services, and coaching were the key needs among para-athletes.

Conclusion(s):

Results showed a need to scale up disability inclusion, render needed services (especially healthcare and coaching) and make resources available

Implications:

There is a need for a suitable model of care for para-athletes. 

Funding acknowledgements:
National Research Foundation (NRF) University of the Witwatersrand
Keywords:
Para-sports
Challenges
South Africa
Primary topic:
Sport and sports injuries
Second topic:
Disability and rehabilitation
Did this work require ethics approval?:
Yes
Name the institution and ethics committee that approved your work:
University of the Witwatersrand Human Research Ethics Committee
Provide the ethics approval number:
M220120
Has any of this material been/due to be published or presented at another national or international conference prior to the World Physiotherapy Congress 2025?:
No

Back to the listing