Orthopaedic Out of Bed Project (OOBP): An implementation study within a United Kingdom integrated care system

Rene Gray, Samantha Colman, Helen Hall, Melissa Taylor, Ryan Bullock, Lydia Bryne, Toby Smith
Purpose:

We aimed to test the replicability and reproducibility of the OOBP project in a different clinical environment. This study will use a larger sample size and considering more clinical outcomes such as delirium, discharge destination and length of stay in addition to the primary outcomes.We aimed to test the replicability and reproducibility of the OOBP project in a different clinical environment. This study will use a larger sample size and considering more clinical outcomes such as delirium, discharge destination and length of stay in addition to the primary outcomes.

Methods:

We used a prospective cohort design. Data from 452 patients was collected for a 4-month period pre-intervention and post-intervention. 

Data was collected using the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) and the HipSprint audit data sets [Royal College of Physicians (RCP)]. 

Training was completed by therapists at the hospital and data was collected by a member of the research team based at the hospital.  

Primary outcome measures:

  • Percentage of patients mobilised out of bed by the day after surgery 
  • Percentage of patients mobilised out of bed by HCAs by the day after surgery 

Secondary outcome measures:

  • Post-operative delirium
  • 30-day mortality
  • Length of stay
  • Discharge destination
Results:

There were no significant differences between the cohorts demographic and intervention data. 

Primary outcomes.

There was a significant difference in the percentage of patients mobilised out of bed by healthcare assistants with an increase from 2% pre-intervention to 42.4% post intervention.

There was no significant different in the overall percentage of patients mobilised out of bed pre-intervention, 88%, versus, post-intervention, 89%.

Secondary outcomes.

There were no significant differences in length of stay, post-operative delirium or mortality at 30 days post operatively. 

Conclusion(s):

A therapy led training programme can lead to improvements in HCAs mobilising patients as an alternative to physiotherapists. 

There was no significant difference in secondary outcomes suggestion no negative impact of HCAs mobilising hip fracture patients for the first time after surgery.

We intend to investigate the implementation science behind our findings using qualitative semi-structured interviews to understand the facilitators and barriers to this intervention.

Implications:

These findings indicate that a therapy led training programme could lead to increased multidisciplinary engagement in early mobilisation.

This could allow better utilisation of physiotherapy skillset to provide rehabilitation and focus on more complex patients. 

Funding acknowledgements:
Acknowledgement to the Norfolk Initiative for Coastal and rural Health Equalities (NICHE) group for supporting with this study.
Keywords:
Hip fracture
Early mobilisation
Training
Primary topic:
Orthopaedics
Second topic:
Service delivery/emerging roles
Third topic:
Education: clinical
Did this work require ethics approval?:
Yes
Name the institution and ethics committee that approved your work:
The Health Research Authority (HRA) and Health and Care Research Wales (HCRW)
Provide the ethics approval number:
337229
Has any of this material been/due to be published or presented at another national or international conference prior to the World Physiotherapy Congress 2025?:
No

Back to the listing