Profiling the physiological demands of a wilderness paramedics selection course

Rob Orr, Elizabeth Marsh, Ben Schram, Elisa Canetti
Purpose:

The aim of this study was to profile the physiological demands of two elements of a state based wilderness paramedic selection course to inform those training or treating individuals attending these courses. 

Methods:

A total of eight candidates completed an initial track walk of 4.8km wearing 20.4kg of load, and 10 candidates completed a follow on 9km mountain walk across various undulating terrains wearing 15kg of load. Participants were monitored with Polar Team Pro physiological harnesses to profile each walk, monitoring distance, speed, and heart rate response.

Results:

There were significant physiological demands encountered in both assessments. Candidates were significantly quicker in the track walk than the mountain walk, average speeds were significantly higher in the track walk (7.6km/hr) than the mountain walk (3.6km/hr), however maximum speed was significantly higher in the mountain walk (13.7km/hr vs 10.4km/hr). Maximum heart rates were similar (track walk 179.0±12.7bpm, mountain walk 179.7±15.8 bpm), average heart rates slightly higher in the track walk (163.6±15.5bpm, mountain walk 156.6±14.7bpm) and minimum heart rates higher in the track walk (123.3±18.8bpm) when compared to the mountain walk (97.9±20.6bpm).  

Conclusion(s):

Despite the differences both walks elicited a similarly high physiological response as measured by high peak heart rates. As such, the track work can serve as a precursor to the mountain walk, which is conducted in a more austere environment. Both walks appear to be occupationally relevant with candidates adopting different strategies based on terrain. 


Implications:

Clinicians treating individuals from or preparing candidates for this unique occupation need to understand the significant physiological demands associated with this profession. The loads carried, distances traversed, an physiological demands appear to be reflective of occupational demands encountered by members of these units. 

Funding acknowledgements:
No funding was received to conduct this research
Keywords:
Occupational Health
Search and Rescue
Paramedicine
Primary topic:
Occupational health and ergonomics
Second topic:
Musculoskeletal
Did this work require ethics approval?:
Yes
Name the institution and ethics committee that approved your work:
Bond University Human Research Ethics Committee
Provide the ethics approval number:
Protocol number BS02205
Has any of this material been/due to be published or presented at another national or international conference prior to the World Physiotherapy Congress 2025?:
No

Back to the listing