IS THE TEMPLE STREET W82GO HEALTHY LIFESTYLES SERVICE EFFECTIVE IN REDUCING OBESITY?

O'Malley G.1,2, Blake C.1, Sheridan N.1, Murphy S.3
1Temple Street Children's University Hospital, Physiotherapy, Dublin, Ireland, 2University College Cork, Physiotherapy, Dublin, Ireland, 3University College Dublin, Paediatrics, Dublin, Ireland

Background: Children with obesity should receive timely treatment in order to prevent the progression of obesity into adulthood1. Lifestyle intervention is considered an effective first step to treating paediatric obesity2.

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical effect of the W82GO service on body mass index standardized deviation score (BMI SDS) at 12-months in children and adolescents. Secondly, we estimated the numbers needed to treat in order to achieve a clinically significant reduction in BMI SDS of 0.25.

Methods: Children and adolescents ( 16 years) with a BMI >98th centile were recruited from Temple Street Children’s University Hospital. Treatment was delivered as a group-based intervention (GT) or as individual outpatient treatment (IT). A group of age- and BMI-matched children on the clinic waiting list served as a control group. Changes in BMI SDS between the two groups were compared in ANCOVA analysis adjusted for baseline age, gender, BMI centile and time between measurements.

Results: 237 parent-child dyads commenced treatment (117 boys, 142 in GT) and attended for baseline assessment. In addition, there were 40 children in the waiting list control group (15 boys). Twelve-month data were available for 180 treated children (88 boys, 112 in group treatment), yielding dropout rates of 21% and 28% in GT and IT respectively. When adjusted for baseline covariates, the change in BMI SDS was -0.18 (95% CI -0.23, -0.13) while in the control group BMI SDS increased by 0.05 (95% CI -0.04, 0.14) (F=8.6, p 0.001). The mean difference of group treatment and individual treatment compared to control were -0.23 (95% CI -0.36, -0.11) and -0.23 (95% CI -0.37, -0.10) respectively. The number needed to treat for a 0.25 reduction in BMI SDS was 5 for group treatment and 6 for individual treatment.

Conclusion(s): Both GT and IT interventions are promising forms of obesity treatment. Further research is warranted to explore the effect of treatment on additional health outcomes via a randomized controlled trial.

Implications: Obesity treatment in childhood may reduce the progression of obesity and co-morbidities into adulthood.

Funding acknowledgements: This work was supported by the Health Service Executive, the Health Research Board and the Temple Street Foundation.

Topic: Paediatrics

Ethics approval: Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Temple Street Childrens University Hospital


All authors, affiliations and abstracts have been published as submitted.

Back to the listing