TIME TO THE FIRST EDGE-OF-BED MOBILISATION IN CRITICALLY ILL ADULTS WITH COVID-19 PNEUMONIA: A RETROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

S. Eggmann1, N. Pecorelli1,2, M.-M. Jeitziner3,4, Y.-A. Que3, A.S. Messmer3
1Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Department of Physiotherapy, Bern, Switzerland, 2Bern University of Applied Sciences, Department of Health Professions, Bern, Switzerland, 3Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Bern, Switzerland, 4University of Basel, Institute of Nursing Science (INS), Department of Public Health (DPH), Faculty of Medicine, Basel, Switzerland

Background: Early mobilisation is recommended as soon as critically ill adults achieve cardiorespiratory stability. Sitting on the edge-of-bed (EOB) is thereby an important milestone to regain functional independence. However, early mobilisation remains underused and implementation rates dropped during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Purpose: The aim of this analysis was to investigate the time to the first EOB mobilisation (time-to-EOB) after intensive care unit (ICU) admission in critically ill adults with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia. We hypothesized that patients with ‘severe’ COVID-19 pneumonia (PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤100mmHg) were mobilised substantially later than patients with ‘moderate’ COVID-19 pneumonia (PaO2/FiO2 ratio >100mmHg). We further explored the association of pre-specified explanatory variables with time-to-EOB.

Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted from March 2020 to May 2021 in a mixed, tertiary ICU where physiotherapy and early mobilisation are standard care. Eligible participants had a laboratory confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia and a prolonged ICU stay (≥72h). Routine data was extracted from electronic databases and included baseline characteristics, ICU treatments, physiotherapy (time to first session, total sessions, duration per session) and mobility level. We used Kaplan-Meier log-rank analysis without censoring to estimate real time-to-EOB and with censoring to account for non-mobilized patients. Association of time-to-EOB with the pre-specified explanatory variables was determined with multiple linear regression. Variables (SOFA, Body-Mass-Index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, PaO2/FiO2, proning, ECMO-use, intubation) were chosen on current evidence and restricted to seven to avoid overfitting.

Results: We recruited 168 participants (26% female, 96% intubated) with a mean age of 63±12 years, a median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) of 11 [IQR 9-14] upon admission and an ICU stay of 10 days [IQR 5-18]. Physiotherapy started within a median of 1.0 days (95%-CI 0.9 to 1.2) with a median session duration of 25 minutes [IQR 20-30] and 10 sessions [IQR 6-19] per patient. 107 (64%) patients sat at least once on the EOB with a median time-to-EOB of 3.9 days [95%-CI 2.3 to 5.5]. In patients with ‘severe’ COVID-19 pneumonia (n=48 [53%]), time-to-EOB was significantly longer than in patients with “moderate” COVID-19 pneumonia (n= 59 [77%]) with 7.2 days [95%-CI 5.7 to 8.8] versus 2.5 days [95%-CI 1.8 to 3.5], p=0.014. Censored, median time-to-EOB was 8.8 days [95%-CI 6.4 to 11.1] for all, 3.9 days [95%-CI 1.6 to 6.2] in the ‘moderate’, and 12.7 days [95%-CI 11.1 to 14.4] in the ‘severe’ group (p<0.001). A delayed time-to-EOB was independently associated with SOFA scoring (0.32 days [95%-CI 0.05 to 0.59], p=0.019) and ECMO-use (13.7 days [95%-CI 10.1 to 17.4], p<0.001).

Conclusions: These real-world results demonstrate that a timely EOB mobilisation within 4 days is achievable in the majority of critically ill adults with COVID-19 pneumonia despite resource-intensive pandemic-peaks. Disease severity and ECMO-use delayed mobilisation, potentially prolonging functional recovery and warranting targeted interventions.

Implications: Our data supports the importance of established physiotherapy programmes in ICUs. Nevertheless, physiotherapists should be cautious in patients with COVID-19 and low PaO2/FiO2at ICU admission and adapt therapy sessions accordingly. Further studies are needed to evaluate the benefit of individualised rehabilitation programmes in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

Funding acknowledgements: None

Keywords:
Early ambulation
Early mobilization
COVID-19

Topics:
Critical care
COVID-19
Cardiorespiratory

Did this work require ethics approval? Yes
Institution: Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
Committee: Ethics Committee of Bern, Switzerland
Ethics number: ID 2021-00613 (approved on April 19, 2021)

All authors, affiliations and abstracts have been published as submitted.

Back to the listing