How blood biomarkers will support neurophysiologists in stroke rehab and prognosis, creating a hospital-based framework standard of care.

File
Dr Gautam Kumar, Dr Seema Grover
Purpose:

To establish a standardised protocol for using blood biomarkers to predict stroke recovery outcomes. This study looks at the feasibility of creating a theoretical framework and selecting the appropriate biomarkers among many blood biomarkers that are important for stroke rehabilitation, for a particular patient, Based on its biomarker profile, systemic personalised rehab is envisaged as a system biology approach to be created by a team of physiotherapists along with neurologists, nutritionists, and biotechnologists in an OPD setting at a tertiary care centre in a developing nation.  



Methods:

Scope: This SOP applies to healthcare professionals involved in stroke patient care.

Step Frame work 
1. Biomarker Selection: Choose biomarkers with established evidence linking them to stroke recovery outcomes. Examples:

    - Neurofilament light chain (NfL)

    - Tau protein

    - S100B

    - C-reactive protein (CRP)

    - Interleukin-6 (IL-6)

2. Blood Sample Collection: Standardize blood sampling procedures:

    - Timing: Acute phase (0-72 hours), subacute phase (7-14 days), and chronic phase (≥ 30 days)

    - Volume: 5-10 mL

    - Tube type: Serum or plasma

    - Storage: -80°C freezer

3. Biomarker Measurement: Utilize validated assays:

    - Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

    - Multiplex bead arrays

    - Mass spectrometry

4. Data Analysis: Apply statistical models to correlate biomarker levels with stroke recovery outcomes:

    - Multivariate regression

    - Machine learning algorithms

    - Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves

5. Interpretation: Establish cutoff values for biomarkers:

    - Dichotomize patients into high/low risk groups

    - Predict recovery outcomes (e.g., modified Rankin Scale)

6. Clinical Integration: Incorporate biomarker results into stroke care pathways:

    - Inform rehabilitation strategies

    - Guide pharmacological interventions

    - Enhance patient counseling

SOP Steps:

1. Patient identification and consent

2. Blood sample collection and processing

3. Biomarker measurement and analysis

4. Data interpretation and reporting

5. Clinical decision-making and integration

6. Documentation and quality control

Quality Control:


1. Regular assay validation

2. Inter-laboratory comparisons

3. Proficiency testing

4. Biomarker stability monitoring







Results:

Training and Competency:


1. Healthcare professionals: Familiarization with SOP and biomarker interpretation

2. Laboratory personnel: Training on assay protocols and quality control

Revision and Update:

1. Regular review of literature and updates on biomarker evidence

2. Revision of SOP as needed

.Summary 

 Patient Assessment

1. Initial evaluation: medical history, physical exam, imaging studies

2. Blood sampling: acute phase (0-72 hours), subacute phase (7-14 days), and chronic phase (≥ 30 days)

II. Biomarker Analysis

1. Laboratory testing: ELISA, multiplex bead arrays, or mass spectrometry

2. Data interpretation: correlate biomarker levels with stroke severity and outcomes


Conclusion(s):

created the following framework 

1. Regular review of biomarker data and treatment outcomes created personalised treatment 

2. Quality improvement initiatives: optimize biomarker testing, rehabilitation protocols








Implications:


Interdisciplinary Collaboration: new Research studies: investigate novel biomarkers, rehabilitation strategies


Funding acknowledgements:
Indian Council Medical Research
Keywords:
Biomarker validation and standardization
Interdisciplinary collaboration and communication
Enhanced personalized medicine
Primary topic:
Neurology
Second topic:
Basic science including molecular and cellular health
Third topic:
Education: continuing professional development
Did this work require ethics approval?:
Yes
Name the institution and ethics committee that approved your work:
Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC)- Bio Medical Research Apollo Research Innovation (ARI)Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals
Provide the ethics approval number:
IAH-BMR-007/01-24
Has any of this material been/due to be published or presented at another national or international conference prior to the World Physiotherapy Congress 2025?:
No

Back to the listing